Know what needs attention before the term ends.
Your school already collects useful evidence throughout the term. Saipris helps your team see when performance is changing, uncover specific learning gaps that an overall score can hide, bring relevant student context into the decision, and decide what deserves attention while there is still time to respond.
Built around the assessment data your school already collects.
Student data becomes useful when it changes a decision.
CA scores, examinations, attendance, teacher observations and other student records all tell part of the story. The difficulty comes when the school needs to decide what those records mean together.
A student can still be passing while their performance is declining. Another can score highly in Maths while one important objective remains weak. The same score can require a different response when the evidence around two students is different.
Saipris provides the intelligence layer between collecting the information and deciding what to do with it.
The clues are already here.
Performance trajectory
Maths declined across three assessments
Hidden objective gap
Equivalent Fractions sits at 25% inside an 85% overall score
Decision needed
Evidence supports a focused check before result compilation
A student can still be passing while their performance is declining.
Looking at CA1, CA2 and CA3 separately tells the school what happened at three points in time. Reading them as a sequence reveals something else.
Saipris can identify declining subject trajectories and emerging academic risk while the term is still running. Oris surfaces the evidence so the academic team can decide whether the pattern needs closer review, and whether existing support or IEP evidence should be considered.
A flag starts the question. It does not automatically mean the student needs more lessons.
Detection answers: “Where should we look?”
Each result may still be above the school's pass mark but the direction has changed.
Overall performance is strong but Fractions deserves review.
An 85% score can still contain something worth reviewing.
An overall score combines several parts of an assessment into one number. Where your school records assessment components against topics, objectives or competencies, Saipris can show where that result came from.
A student may perform strongly overall while one objective remains significantly weaker. That does not make the student weak in the whole subject. It gives the teacher a more precise question.
You do not need deeper assessment data to start.
Schools that record only subject-level scores can still use Saipris for trajectory and academic-risk intelligence.
Schools that connect assessment marks to objectives or competencies give Saipris more detail to work with.
Better data increases precision, it is not a barrier to adoption.
The same score does not always need the same response.
Academic scores show achievement. They do not explain everything happening around a student. Where the evidence exists, Saipris can consider performance alongside information such as attendance, learner-profile evidence, developmental monitoring and existing SEN or IEP support.
Each record keeps its own meaning. Attendance does not become proof of why a student performed poorly. A learning barrier does not become a judgment about ability. An IEP does not become an academic ranking.
Saipris brings the relevant evidence into the same decision so the people supporting the student can ask a better question. The teacher, SENCO, therapist, facilitator and parent should not need the same version of the story.
Academic performance
What has the student demonstrated?
Attendance
Is consistency relevant?
Learner evidence
What strengths or preferences are worth considering?
Support evidence
Does a SENCO, therapist or facilitator hold relevant context?
Oris guidance
What deserves review next?
Different evidence. Different meaning. One better-informed decision.
Every subject does not need the same pressure.
Finding a concern is only part of the decision. One subject may need direct remediation. Another may be stable enough to maintain. A promising area may benefit from focused development, while a clear strength may deserve greater challenge.
Oris helps the school distinguish between four broad priorities:
The student is performing adequately in this area. More pressure may not be the best use of their effort.
The evidence supports focused development.
A clear gap, declining trajectory or relevant learning-access concern needs support.
Strong performance and supporting evidence justify enrichment or deeper work.
A student's weakest subject should not automatically define their academic plan.
Relevant learner evidence can also help the school identify strengths or areas worth exploring further.
Saipris helps you expand the student's opportunities instead of deciding what career they are meant for.
Focus strategies depend on the wider evidence available for the student. These scores alone are not enough to generate the strategy.
One student concern. Different people. Different decisions.
The same performance concern creates different responsibilities.
Saipris should not give everyone the same generic recommendation.
Saipris keeps each role's evidence in its proper place. Academic evidence, SEN support evidence and IEP progress can inform the same decision without becoming one generic record.
A child's support should not depend on which teacher is in the room.
A school may already know that a student needs a particular adaptation or form of support. The challenge is making sure that understanding does not disappear when the child changes subject teacher, class or term.
Saipris gives schools a structured way to record learning barriers, adaptations and support evidence around the student.
Where that context is relevant to a performance concern, Oris can bring it into the guidance without turning the child's support need into a judgment about their ability.
See how Saipris supports inclusive schoolsSee how therapy centres can use the IEP workflowGood support should survive a change of teacher.
A child can receive SEN support without having an IEP.
Where an IEP is appropriate, Saipris provides structured goals, progress evidence and risk monitoring without turning the IEP into another academic score.
SEN support and IEP involvement remain separate, so one does not automatically imply the other.
Oris helps the school make sense of the evidence.
Oris is the intelligence layer inside Saipris. It can surface academic risk, identify focused assessment concerns, bring relevant student context into the decision and help translate that evidence into practical guidance.
The evidence becomes visible and the people around the student remain responsible for the decision.
Oris should be able to show why a concern was raised.
A declining trajectory should point back to the assessment sequence. A topic concern should point back to the relevant component evidence.
More certainty is not always better guidance.
When the available information does not support a conclusion, Saipris can preserve that limitation rather than inventing an explanation.
The intelligence does not depend entirely on generative AI.
Core risk detection and structured intelligence continue to work without AI. AI can improve synthesis and explanation where appropriate.
We use AI where it improves the guidance. We do not ask schools to trust AI instead of evidence.
Explore learning and development beyond the report card.
Saipris Atlas gives parents and educators public access to psychometric and developmental evaluations. Explore learning preferences, strengths and developmental milestones through evaluations designed to provide educational guidance.
The results should be treated as signals for understanding and planning. They are not diagnoses, fixed measures of ability or predictions of what a child should become.
Available at atlas.saipris.com
For schools looking for the full performance-intelligence platform, book a Saipris demo.
Built for different learning environments
One performance-intelligence layer can support mainstream academics, inclusive support teams and therapy-centre programmes without turning them into the same workflow. Therapy and special needs centres can use the IEP capability on its own where that is the work they need to organise.
See academic concerns earlier and understand them more precisely.
Use CA and assessment data to identify changing trajectories, focused gaps and what deserves attention before report-card preparation.
Saipris for Mainstream SchoolsConnect academic performance with the support evidence that matters.
Maintain a mainstream academic standard while giving staff the relevant learning-access context for students who need additional support.
Saipris for Inclusive SchoolsGive individual support programmes more structure and continuity.
Use the IEP workflow for goals, progress, interventions and parent reporting, even where the centre does not need the wider academic workflow.
Saipris for Therapy CentresDifferent contexts. The same platform. All three are using Saipris.
Bring your assessment structure. We will show you what Saipris can see.
If your school uses CA1, CA2, CA3, examinations or another assessment structure, that is where the conversation should start. We will show you how Saipris reads performance across the term, what more detailed assessment evidence can reveal, and how Oris helps turn a concern into clearer guidance for the people responsible for responding.
You do not need to change the way your school works before seeing whether Saipris fits.
What will your school know before this term ends?
The assessment data will be collected either way. Saipris helps your team use it while there is still time for the information to change what happens next.